Increasing Talent Density for Recruiting Leaders

Written By Eric Guidice
Talent Density for Recruiting Leaders Image
 

Table of Contents

    When I was running recruiting, my source of truth was a spreadsheet that required every recruiter to update the status of every requisition, its blockers, changes & 10+ other columns of key information every Friday. (We called it Feedback Friday.) Motivated by pizza, these 2-3 hour sessions ensured I could go into the Monday exec meeting and hold my own as I got quizzed on everything from an individual requisitions status, to the overall performance of the service of recruiting. Here’s what was wrong with that.

    What’s killing talent density for Recruiting Leaders

    First, let’s define Talent Density, specifically for Recruiting Leaders. Talent Density refers to the measure of leadership contribution relative to the number of resources you’re using to produce that contribution. While spreadsheets do not cost money, they cost an amount of time and produce lower fidelity data & reporting. Software that saves time while producing better results improves recruiting leaders’ output disproportionate to the cost & effort of implementation. Below are all the ways spreadsheets diluted my recruiting leadership talent density when I was an in-house leader.

    • Tremendous time costs. Recruiters met with managers & updated their recruiting leaders. Leaders met with Recops. Weekly Syncs. Troubleshooting. It took forever.

    • Once a week data fidelity (That broke over the weekend). Even when we got it right, an over-the-weekend change from an offer decline, or a manager doing a reforecast, meant that I was already out of data on Monday.

    • Zero Week over Week data. Macro trends about headcount were lost in spreadsheet snapshots.

    • No Macro Data on the Service of Recruiting. I lived week to week. I couldn’t identify trends about hiring manager changes, backfill impact on capacity, compensation, or hundreds of other metrics. It was a black box.

    • Funnel data was my only tool. The only real data was funnel conversion rates, time to fill, and offer accepts — but recruiting performance is a function of business inputs. Forecast changes, backfill adds, hiring manager behaviors, and more were all missing from the conversation.

    • Always surprised by Changes. Email approvals. Updates from meetings. Salary approvals directly from the CEO. Not only was I surprised when things changed, but I couldn’t aggregate these changes into a story during a QBR to show execs how these bad actions impacted things.

    • Missing “The why” when things changed. If a salary increased, a role was cancelled, or a backfill was requested, I had no idea the source. I had to chase this information.

    • “He Said, She said” data. If two recruiters fill 10 jobs each, who worked harder? Which hiring managers created more encumbrance? I was constantly having to weigh subjective context, which strained team culture.

    • “Dumb” Formulas. What is our workload? What is our recruiting capacity? What was the time to fill? The data points for the calculations were manually entered. The workload that should be done by data scientists was assigned loose point systems that didn’t hold water when using them to communicate with hiring managers.

    • Everything was a P0 High Priority. Every backfill. Every new opening. Always high priority. Hiring managers only saw their world and fought tooth and nail to get recruiting services. If everything’s a priority, nothing is — until you have to answer for it in the exec meeting.

    • Two 50k roles combined do not equal one 100k job. Start dates, cost of employment associated with different job levels or locations, are not all considerations when hiring managers navigate their budget.

    These are the highlights, but the list goes on. If you’ve worked in Recruiting Leadership or Recruiting Operations, you know all too well.

    Increase talent density by unlocking data hidden in headcount

    Automating the processes of updating headcount data not only frees up more time to address real TA leader responsibilities, but it also improves the quality of service. There is a tremendous amount of data for recruiting leaders in headcount plans that is lost in spreadsheets, and we specifically built headcount365 to extract this data and dive into it to TA leaders to increase their talent density.

    Recruiting Leaders get more time via Automation

    Our TA Customers get 30% of their time back. (~1.5 days a week). They go from chasing down data, to actioning it, participating in conversations with headcount intelligence previously impossible to generate with spreadsheets (Read more about how Planet Labs saved 30% of Leadership time with headcount365).

    • Eliminate every sync meeting
      All the sync meetings between hiring managers and recruiters, recruiters & their managers (including my beloved Feedback Friday) are all replaced with automation. The data is just up to date.

    • Hiring Managers have self-service access
      Without a recruiter meeting, hiring managers know everything about their plan, including its current recruiting status & pipeline from the ATS. For all requests & changes, they have transparency into the status of the request.

    • Less time building reports
      Recruiting Operations data scrambles are real — especially when data is housed in different systems (Think attrition to backfill). Having the data in real-time eliminates all the time needed to clean the data, giving leaders more time to act on it.

    • Eliminate Job Pushes to ATS & ATS Cleanup
      Instead of data entry into the ATS, the sync meetings between hiring managers and recruiters, recruiters & their managers (including my beloved Feedback Friday) are all replaced with automation. The data is just up to date.

    • Automated Sarbanes Oxley Compliance

      Changes to access, approvals, or change history are automatically captured without the need for costly data audits. (https://www.headcount365.com/blog/headcount-management-amp-sarbanes-oxley-sox-compliance)

    Increase talent density with better data quality

    • No more “he said, she said” about results, or changes

      Activity tracking highlights what actions were taken (or not), so you don’t need to dig through emails to explain missed hires or delays. Descriptions about what happened to a req lose the perspective bias and now have objective data.

    • FP&A Calculations that actually align with FP&A

      Salary isn’t the only calculation of cost, so when hiring managers “horse trade”, everyone is reading the same financial impact.

    • High-priority single source of truth

      When everything’s a priority, nothing is. A centralized system creates clear visibility into which roles are real, urgent, and funded.

    • Know exactly how hiring managers impact recruiting

      Recruiting doesn’t fail in isolation. Track who made changes, when, and why — so you can pinpoint performance issues, regardless of team.

    • Add Workload + Recruiting Capacity to Performance conversations

      Add precision to managing recruiters by incorporating Track every change to the hiring plan — including timing, ownership, and impact — so nothing slips through the cracks.

    • Formulas not only don’t break, they get more advanced

      Point systems for requisition workload. Time to fill estimates. Financial variance. Capacity/demand actuals reporting. We’ve all made basic versions, but the fidelity with software is unmatched.

    • HRIS, ATS, & FP&A data in one dataset

      Reconciling offer data against HRIS data and verifying with finance now happens in one place.

    Headcount data improves the storytelling ability of Recruiting Leaders

    • A “Macro” story of the service of recruiting for the QBR
      Recruiting teams have the capacity to deliver offer accepts against the demand of the business. Being able to articulate the story of demand changes (backfills, new adds, horse trading) and their impact on the recruiting service helps unlock resources to meet future demand.

    • FP&A storytelling
      Every dollar tied to every req — mapped and trackable from start to finish. Not only can you deliver accurate financials, but you do so with the knowledge and data of an FP&A leader.

    • Managing recruiting teams (IC or Manager)
      If two recruiters fill 10 jobs each, you can now articulate & quantify the workload & difficulty to not only reward recruiters but also coach & develop them.

    • Workforce Planning
      YoY headcount tracking gives WFP teams data about recruiting capacity, org design, span of control, and much more. (https://www.headcount365.com/blog/yoy-headcount-data-tracking)

    • Boards & investors
      Clearly show the impact of Talent Acquisition on revenue, OPEX, and growth. (https://www.headcount365.com/blog/ceos-guide-to-headcount-in-board-meetings)

    headcount365 increases talent density for recruiting leaders

    When you strip away the manual work, the patchwork systems, and the version-control headaches, you create space for real leadership. The Talent Leaders using headcount365 aren’t spending their time formatting reports or explaining delays — they’re using live data to drive conversations, spot issues early, and help their teams perform. It’s not about doing more for the sake of it. It’s about having the right inputs to make better calls, faster. That’s what builds trust across the org — and that’s where density starts to show up.

    Eric Guidice
    Next

    YoY Headcount Data Revolutionizes Workforce Planning